Lo que me mata de esas cosas es lo facil que las feministas claman por igualidad discriminando a los hombres. Philosophy -No constants or persistence. Rigidity is masculine; the feminine is fluid. I.e., fluid mechanics is hard for men 'because it deals with "feminine" fluids in contrast to "masculine" rigid mechanics'. -No state. The State is The Man. 'Nuff said. Hence, the language should be purely functional. -Women are better than men with natural language. Hence, the language should be English-based like HyperCard/LiveCode. -Women are more social than men. Hence, social coding should be the only option. The code only runs if it is in a public repo. -Instead of "running" a program, which implies thin privilege and pressure to "work out", programs are "given birth". After birth, a program rolls for a 40% chance of executing literally as the code is written, 40% of being "psychoanalytically incompatible", and 40% of executing by a metaphorical epistemology the order of the functions found in main(). Programs are never to be "forked", as the word has clear misogynistic tendencies and is deeply problematic. Instead, programmers may never demand "forking", but ask for the program to voluntarily give permission. "Forking" will henceforth be called "consenting", and it is entirely up to the program to decide if the consent stands valid, regardless of the progress of the system clock. Me mata eso de que se le tiene que pedir permiso al programa para que se abra/compile. Y la mejor gema para lo ultimo: -Societal influences have made men often focus on the exterior appearances of women. This poisons our society and renders relationships to be shallow, chauvinistic, and debases our standards of beauty. To combat that, C+= is to tackle only audio and text I/O, and never graphics. Osea que o aprendo a interpretar los sonidos de cada programa que uso o son un macho chubinista. Aha. Encima esto es poco mas que un disfraz para un lenguaje de programacion comun y corriente, por naturaleza las computadoras interpretan lenguaje matematico por lo que para hacerlas hacer algo se tiene que dar un mensaje claro y preciso, hacer que una computadora interprete un lenguaje natural/organico seria esencialmente crear una inteligencia artificial completa, lo que seria un desafio tremendo. Por no olvidar que para llegar a ese paso se necesitaria programar en una lenguaje matematico porque sorpresa, nuestro cerebro funciona con los mismos principios que una computadora. Y parece que si no pones Código: // Remember to check your privilege. Always. PrivilegeCheck(). el codigo no funciona en absoluto, o al menos eso interprete por el comentario.
Jaja, es genial... Spoiler 10. Instead of "running" a program, which implies thin privilege and pressure to "work out", programs are "given birth". After birth, a program rolls for a 40% chance of executing literally as the code is written, 40% of being "psychoanalytically incompatible", and 40% of executing by a metaphorical epistemology the order of the functions found in main(). 11. Programs are never to be "forked", as the word has clear misogynistic tendencies and is deeply problematic. Instead, programmers may never demand "forking", but ask for the program to voluntarily give permission. "Forking" will henceforth be called "consenting", and it is entirely up to the program to decide if the consent stands valid, regardless of the progress of the system clock. 11. Forced program termination is not allowed unless the program consents to it. The process is part of the choice of the program, not the programmer.